Ideas, frameworks and reflections on making readiness work in practice. At Enquirya, we don’t just build systems — we help organisations rethink how operational learning, compliance and readiness come together. This space shares the key lessons we've learned while working with crisis teams, CISO departments and public safety organisations across Europe.
From evaluation models and regulatory frameworks to technology adoption and implementation: here's how we see the readiness landscape evolving.
The real challenge isn’t just meeting NIS2. It’s proving that your organisation is ready — in practice. The NIS2 Directive brings a welcome push toward structured risk management, incident reporting and accountability in critical infrastructure. But as many CISO teams are finding out, compliance with the directive doesn't necessarily mean you're ready. Readiness isn't a checklist — it's a system. And right now, that system is missing or fragmented in many organisations.
That’s why at Enquirya, we don’t just track compliance — we help you build readiness as a measurable, reportable process. One that aligns with NIS2, CER, DORA — and your own operational needs. Want to explore what that looks like for your organisation?
Compliance ≠ Control
Let’s take Article 24 NIS2 as an example. It requires organisations to:
Many organisations can write the report. But few can show what’s changed — who was involved, how decisions were followed up, or whether lessons translated into new behaviour or training. And when a regulator or board asks, “What have we actually learned and done since the last incident?”, vague answers won’t suffice.
The Readiness Gap
At Enquirya, we call this the readiness gap: the space between what your policies say you do — and what you can actually demonstrate. This gap typically shows up in:
This isn’t a tech problem — it’s a systems problem. And it needs an integrated approach where innovative technology can help.
What CISO Teams Actually Need
To move from compliance to readiness, you need:
With these building blocks, you create a system that supports not just audits — but real accountability and learning.
If your dashboard doesn’t drive decisions, it’s not helping you manage readiness. In both crisis management and cybersecurity, dashboards are everywhere. But despite the influx of graphs, heatmaps and tables, many leaders still lack a clear answer to one basic question:
“Where do we stand right now — and what should we do next?”
That’s because many dashboards are designed for data visibility, not decision support. They show activity, but not insight. They monitor, but don’t guide. Ready for a dashboard that drives real decisions? We’d love to show you how this works in practice.
From Vanity Metrics to Meaningful Indicators
We’ve seen dashboards full of stats that look impressive — number of users, incidents logged, documents uploaded, forms completed — but don’t actually help anyone take action.
A meaningful dashboard should:
Readiness is a Process — Your Dashboard Should Reflect That
Enquirya, we design dashboards around the actual readiness cycle. That includes:
Each layer builds on the previous — so leadership can trace the full line from incident to insight, and from insight to action.
For CISO Teams and Crisismanagement Leaders
Good operational readiness dashboards help teams to:
And perhaps most importantly: People in the organisation actually use it — because it reflects their real work.
What We Build (and Why It Works)
The Enquirya dashboard ecosystem is:
Copyright © Enquirya. All Rights Reserved